Filed by Conrad · Case 26-104594-DO

04d Third Supplement Omnibus Part One Airtag Cyberstalking 2026-05-12

Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Divorce) · Wayne County Circuit Court (Third Judicial Circuit), Hon. Nicole N. Goodson · Filed 2026-05-12

Canonical record: rockenhaus.net. Disputed domains are indexed at /disputed-domains/ (not authoritative).

Loading document…

Filing text (searchable excerpt)

STATE OF MICHIGAN

                 IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
                               FAMILY DIVISION, DOMESTIC RELATIONS

 ADRIENNE MARJORIE ROCKENHAUS,                                    Case No. 26-104594-DO
   Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
                                                                  Hon. Nicole N. Goodson
 v.

 CONRAD ALAN ROCKENHAUS,
  Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

 DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S THIRD SUPPLEMENT TO OMNIBUS MOTION
   PART ONE (PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE), CONCERNING APPLE AIRTAG
 CYBERSTALKING, COMPROMISED ICLOUD ACCOUNT, AND CROSS-PLATFORM
               WITNESS-INTIMIDATION INFRASTRUCTURE

NOW COMES Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Conrad Alan Rockenhaus, appearing pro se, and respectfully
submits this Third Supplement to Part One (Preservation of Evidence) of the Omnibus Motion previously
filed in this matter, pursuant to MCR 2.310, MCR 2.302, and the Court's inherent equitable authority. In
support, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff states as follows.

                                       LCR 2.119(B) COMPLIANCE
1. The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to LCR 2.119(B)(1), that he has complied with all provisions
   of LCR 2.119(B) on motion practice. This Supplement adds preservation categories to a previously-filed
   motion that already requested concurrence under LCR 2.119(B)(2); the present Supplement is
   procedurally an extension of that earlier filing and is necessary to present in light of the factual
   developments set forth in Section II below.

        I. RELATIONSHIP TO ORIGINAL OMNIBUS MOTION AND PRIOR SUPPLEMENTS
2. Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff filed his Omnibus Motion for Order to Preserve Evidence, Financial
   Disclosure and Accounting, and Emergency TRO Regarding Premarital Domain rockenhaus.com on
   April 16, 2026 ("Original Omnibus"). Part One of the Original Omnibus requested entry of a Preservation
   Order covering Categories A through H, supported by Teel v. Meredith, 284 Mich. App. 412 (2009).
3. On May 5, 2026, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff filed a Supplement to the Original Omnibus concerning Part
   Three (rockenhaus.com premarital domain) ("Part Three Supplement").
4. On May 6, 2026, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff filed a First Supplement to Part One of the Original
   Omnibus expanding the preservation categories.
5. On May 10-11, 2026, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff filed a Second Supplement to Part One of the Original
   Omnibus, adding Categories O through T concerning the vacation of the marital residence by
   Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant on May 9, 2026, the sockpuppet-coordination evidence surfacing on X
   (formerly Twitter), the email-harassment evidence directed at Defendant's witness Ann Helgren, and the
   cross-platform amplification of the May 4, 2026 "Dead Man's Switch" Facebook post.
6. This Third Supplement to Part One adds five additional preservation categories, U through Y, addressing
   a discrete subject matter that has crystallized since the Second Supplement was filed: the Apple AirTag
    tracking device Defendant placed in his own wallet pre-incarceration as a personal security measure, the
    [email protected] iCloud account that Defendant originally created and operated and to which the
    AirTag was paired but to which Defendant no longer has access, the conversion of that device-pairing
    relationship into a surveillance vector against Defendant through Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's
    unauthorized access to the iCloud account during and after Defendant's federal incarceration, and the
    cross-platform witness-intimidation infrastructure that has been operated using the data product of that
    surveillance vector.
 7. This Third Supplement is filed in addition to, and is not in lieu of, Defendant's contemporaneously filed
    Emergency Motion for Preservation Order and Order Prohibiting Spoliation of Evidence. The Emergency
    Motion seeks injunction-track relief on a time-sensitive basis

Excerpt of 32906 characters. Download the full PDF for complete text.

About this filing

04d Third Supplement Omnibus Part One Airtag Cyberstalking 2026-05-12: filing by Conrad Alan Rockenhaus in Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Divorce), Michigan Case No. 26-104594-DO, Wayne County Circuit Court. PDF and searchable text at rockenhaus.net (canonical court record). Disputed third-party domains: /disputed-domains/.

File name
04d_Third_Supplement_Omnibus_Part_One_AirTag_Cyberstalking_2026-05-12.pdf
Filed date
Case number
26-104594-DO
Category
Filed by Conrad
Disputed domains
View disputed domains (asserted controlled by Adrienne Rockenhaus; not authoritative).
Related context
FAQ, Joe Prich evidence, Rob Hein
Canonical record
rockenhaus.net
Direct PDF link
https://rockenhaus.net/wayne_do_26-104594-DO/filed/04d_Third_Supplement_Omnibus_Part_One_AirTag_Cyberstalking_2026-05-12.pdf