Filed by Conrad · Case 26-104594-DO

05 Motion For Leave Excess Interrogatories 2026-04-16

Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Divorce) · Wayne County Circuit Court (Third Judicial Circuit), Hon. Nicole N. Goodson · Filed 2026-04-16

Canonical record: rockenhaus.net. Disputed domains are indexed at /disputed-domains/ (not authoritative).

Loading document…

Filing text (searchable excerpt)

STATE OF MICHIGAN

                  IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
                                 FAMILY DIVISION, DOMESTIC RELATIONS

 ADRIENNE MARJORIE ROCKENHAUS,                                      Case No. 26-104594-DO
   Plaintiff,
                                                                    Hon. Yvonna C. Abraham
 v.

 CONRAD ALAN ROCKENHAUS,
  Defendant.

      DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE EXCESS INTERROGATORIES

NOW COMES Defendant, Conrad Alan Rockenhaus, appearing pro se, and pursuant to MCR 2.309(A),
respectfully moves this Honorable Court for leave to serve thirty-seven (37) interrogatories upon Plaintiff
Adrienne Marjorie Rockenhaus, exceeding the twenty (20) interrogatory limit by seventeen (17). In support
thereof, Defendant states as follows:

                                            I. INTRODUCTION
1. MCR 2.309(A) limits each party to twenty interrogatories without leave of court, including all discrete
   subparts. Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories contains thirty-eight questions. Defendant respectfully
   requests leave to serve all thirty-eight interrogatories simultaneously, as each is necessary and non-
   duplicative given the extraordinary complexity of this case.
2. This is not a routine divorce action. Defendant has filed a Counterclaim documenting extensive financial
   misconduct spanning multiple federal and state proceedings, three active law enforcement
   investigations, unauthorized access to federally protected accounts, Representative Payee fraud, abuse
   of Power of Attorney, false statements to law enforcement, deliberate homelessness engineering, and
   wrongful retention of personal property and premarital assets. The scope of misconduct alleged, and
   documented, in this case is far beyond what twenty interrogatories can adequately address.

          II. THE COMPLEXITY OF THIS CASE JUSTIFIES EXCESS INTERROGATORIES
3. This case involves the following distinct subject matter areas, each requiring independent inquiry:
   a. Financial accounts and the unauthorized diversion of approximately $39,326.87 in federally protected
   VA Disability Compensation and SSDI benefits;
   b. Plaintiff's unauthorized access to Defendant's va.gov account using his id.me credentials and
   redirection of his direct deposit;
   c. Plaintiff's conduct as SSA-appointed Representative Payee and the resulting federal overpayment
   demand of $12,074.50;
   d. Plaintiff's exercise of Power of Attorney during Defendant's incarceration, including every action taken
   under that authority;
   e. Plaintiff's communications with the BOP, FCI Milan, Livingston County Jail, the DOJ, and all other third
   parties regarding Defendant during his incarceration;
    f. Plaintiff's extraction and weaponization of Defendant's private medical, psychiatric, and prescription
    records obtained through the Power of Attorney and related fiduciary relationships;
    g. Plaintiff's pre-release planning for Defendant's March 2, 2026 release from federal custody, including
    coordination with Ann Helgren, VA social workers, and law enforcement;
    h. Plaintiff's false statements to the Redford Township Police Department on March 2, 2026 regarding
    Defendant's residency and mental health status;
    i. Cannabytes, LLC, Defendant's role as formally designated corporate officer, the company's finances,
    its personnel, and Plaintiff's wrongful exclusion of Defendant from business operations;
    j. Plaintiff's wrongful retention of Defendant's premarital internet domains, including rockenhaus.com,
    skyphusion.com, and greyponyit.com;
    k. The basis for and timing of the Personal Protection Order filed February 20, 2026, including its
    relationship to Defendant's filing of his Motion to Sever on February 18, 2026;
    l. Wayne County venue, Plaintiff's residency history, and the judicial estoppel arising from Plaintiff's prior
    sworn statements that Defendant n

Excerpt of 6602 characters. Download the full PDF for complete text.

About this filing

05 Motion For Leave Excess Interrogatories 2026-04-16: filing by Conrad Alan Rockenhaus in Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Divorce), Michigan Case No. 26-104594-DO, Wayne County Circuit Court. PDF and searchable text at rockenhaus.net (canonical court record). Disputed third-party domains: /disputed-domains/.

File name
05_Motion_for_Leave_Excess_Interrogatories_2026-04-16.pdf
Filed date
Case number
26-104594-DO
Category
Filed by Conrad
Disputed domains
View disputed domains (asserted controlled by Adrienne Rockenhaus; not authoritative).
Related context
FAQ, Joe Prich evidence, Rob Hein
Canonical record
rockenhaus.net
Direct PDF link
https://rockenhaus.net/wayne_do_26-104594-DO/filed/05_Motion_for_Leave_Excess_Interrogatories_2026-04-16.pdf