Opposing party · Case 26-102221-PP

03e PPO Pet Reponse To Motion To Terminate Pt 5

Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (PPO) · Wayne County Circuit Court (Third Judicial Circuit)

Canonical record: rockenhaus.net. Disputed domains are indexed at /disputed-domains/ (not authoritative).

Loading document…

Filing text (searchable excerpt)

9:40

<
                                     Robby )
    , .h;\Sil;f'l~S~4l 't;,.&(liOl)trooit.~M<
      $!'l,;'t u¼i! W, !NI t'; Mil.Of 1h11, '""''"'U 11<1'
      """"•""1•"0

      ~-3§.b.   ~v 11~n,ot asi."if'{) ~ • ~ t o t ~
      MY -       « ; m ; ~ 1!llo Illa\ pstI     d<.n1 w>m

      kJ1~~ to~ into troottit.~, t:ttt hl"'" ruttv
      -"

                                                         ',       ~'      ,w   ""'""'"""=

                                        ,1Wn.at ~as the emaif.:
                                         t~~~re,s he ~!ftdf~~~~i
                                                                       Delivered

conradrockenhalusa2@QIU
ail.com

+               pMessage

                                    The                           I'm

Q       W          E          R         T          Y          U                O            P

    A         S         D           F         G         H         J      K            L

♦               ZX                 CV                   BNM                                 0

    123                                                                          f.'.:l
EXHIBITK
EXHIBIT K.": Proof of 'Actual Notice' Served to Respondent's Counsel

Description of Evidence: An email timestamped February 23, 2026 (10:46 PM), sent by the
Petitioner to the Respondent's federal defense attorney, Kaycee Berente.

Relevance to Contempt: This exhibit establishes premeditation and willful defiance of the
Court. It proves that the Respondent's legal counsel was formally served with the Ex Parte PPO
and explicitly warned that the Respondent was barred from the Petitioner's residence prior to his
release from federal custody. It demonstrates that the Respondent possessed undeniable
knowledge of the active PPO before he orchestrated his physical transportation to the
Petitioner's driveway, proving his ongoing violations are calculated.
EXHIBITL
EXHIBIT L: Petitioner's Good-Faith Effort to Utilize Lawful Channels

Description of Evidence: An email timestamped February 26, 2026 (2:32 AM), sent by the
Petitioner to the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Respondent's federal attorney.

Relevance to Contempt: This exhibit proactively obliterates the Respondent's false claims of
"theft." It proves that the Petitioner is strictly abiding by the Court's financial injunction by
insisting that the division of marital assets be handled legally. The email documents the
Petitioner proactively requesting the Respondent's address so that legal counsel can lawfully
mail him the necessary financial and divorce documents, highlighting the stark contrast between
the Petitioner's lawful behavior and the Respondent's attempts at third-party extortion.
          Gmail                                                         Adrienne Rockenhaus 

Lega l Service, Financial Coordination & Family Care: Discharge Address for Conrad
Rockenhaus
Adrienne Rockenhaus                                                     Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 2:32 AM
To : Cindy.Albain@va .gov
Bee: Verona [email protected], Malinda.Williams@va .gov

  Dear Ms. Albain (Social Work Leadership) and Ms. Robinson & Ms. Williams (Privacy Office):

 As the clinical social work team overseeing his case has been previously notified, I am a judicially protected victim holding
 an active Wayne County Ex Parte Personal Protection Order (Case No. 26-102221-PP) against my husband, Conrad
 Rockenhaus. He is scheduled for release from BOP custody on March 2, 2026. This state court order legally bars him
 from my residence, my vicinity, and my digital infrastructure.

  I am writing to you directly to request the exact physical address of the VA facility or funded medical housing where your
  department will be placing him upon his mandated handoff on March 2. I urgently need this address for two strictly legal
  and administrative reasons :
  1. Legal Service of the PPO: I must direct the

Excerpt of 5644 characters. Download the full PDF for complete text.

About this filing

03e PPO Pet Reponse To Motion To Terminate Pt 5: opposing-party filing by Adrienne Rockenhaus (aka Adrienne Blair aka Adrienne Hein (@adezero)) in Rockenhaus v. Rockenhaus (Personal Protection Order (PPO)), Michigan Case No. 26-102221-PP, Wayne County Circuit Court. PDF and searchable text at rockenhaus.net (canonical court record). Disputed third-party domains: /disputed-domains/.

File name
03e_ppo_pet_reponse_to_motion_to_terminate_pt_5.pdf
Case number
26-102221-PP
Category
Opposing party
Disputed domains
View disputed domains (asserted controlled by Adrienne Rockenhaus; not authoritative).
Related context
FAQ, Joe Prich evidence, Rob Hein
Canonical record
rockenhaus.net
Direct PDF link
https://rockenhaus.net/wayne_ppo_26-102221-PP/opposing/03e_ppo_pet_reponse_to_motion_to_terminate_pt_5.pdf